Mikey's RC Forum  

Go Back   Mikey's RC Forum > RC Electric Aircraft General > Designing Planes - Flight theory (Lift, Gravity, Thrust, Drag...)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2010, 02:50 PM
ChrisVon ChrisVon is offline
A+ Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 3
Default Fuselage Top Profile

Hi Everybody,
I'm beginning the process of scratchbuilding my own RC aircraft right now (a biplane), and after looking at the designs here (such as the P-51, and the Sport Trainer), I notice that only the side profiles are used in the design and build. I'm not criticizing this decision, as I've seen other websites that present foam aircraft design in a similar manner. But I've also seen designs that presented a side AS WELL AS a top profile.
What I'm wondering is, when should BOTH be used. I've created a 3d model of what I'm going for, and I think that creating a fuselage with both profiles would make my design look better. (Again, I don't want anyone thinking that I'm insinuating that Will's P-51 and Sport Trainer don't look good WITHOUT a second profile.....I plan on building them as his PDF's suggest even). BUT, is there an aerodynamic reason NOT to include it, or is it simply for simplicity's sake?
Thanks for the input!

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2010, 09:02 AM
Mikey Mikey is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 436
Default

Hi Chris,

For me it's purely for simplicity and cost. I love to fly but amd a little impatient when it comes to building. But I do respect a nice looking "full bodied" scale plane.

Will
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2010, 09:16 AM
ChrisVon ChrisVon is offline
A+ Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 3
Default Agreed

Yeah, as yourself, I certainly respect the scratchbuilders who do the "full" fuselage. But I have to confess, I've seen profile planes fly that were almost hard to tell whether or not they were "full" fuselage, or "flat". At one time I swore I'd never build / fly a flat foamy, but I'm hooked now.

If it's just a simplicity issue, I'll make a flat foamy bipe, with both the vertical (side) and horizontal (top / bottom) profiles then. It's not like it'll cost me an arm and a leg one way or the other!

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2010, 08:00 AM
frogs84ss's Avatar
frogs84ss frogs84ss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tinley Park I.L.
Posts: 86
Default

+1 full fuselage is a pain. but i like not seeing the electronics and what not. but i am also impatiant when it comes to building luckly the weathe in chicago keeps me from going outside alot. so right now it's not to bad. but spring time will be crazy. so i'm trying to do all my building now so all i have to do i fly this summer
__________________
If it's green, it's for me !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2010, 01:48 PM
toniferous2000 toniferous2000 is offline
Free posting
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 33
Default Top profile..

If I understand what you are saying, you are talking about two flat profile sections built in an interlocking "t" where one is the side profile and one is the top/bottom profile, right?
I have seen many 3-d electrics built like this....usually the Edge 540 or similar.
I believe that the top/bottom profile is almost purely cosmetic in nature although it would also help to strengthen the profile fuse. just a thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.